Administration of justice in Ukraine as an indicator of modern constitutionalism

The relevance of the study judicial constitutionalism is explained by public necessity to restore confidence in Constitutional Court Ukraine. reforming regulation Ukraine relevant this study. purpose research cover connection and impact results administration justice on overall state constitutionalism. In course exploring subject work, authors, use dialectical method cognition clarify essence concept “constitutionalism”, formal legal analyse sources constitutional law relating develop recommendations for overcoming identified systemic problems, logical identify compliance judges authorities with basic principles order Ukraine, analysis practice, differences understanding content rule principle justice, thus its unequal application, two problems. One them emerged as a result Supreme Court's ambiguous position that notary cannot be defendant cases illegally committed executive inscriptions, other, contrary, due ignoring decisions empowered ensure social protection population. proposed some specific practical aspects - proceedings identification problems practice which affect assessment reality. authors emphasise raising culture awareness, both society general among lawyers particular. It possible if educational process combines acquisition professional competencies education human qualities. significance work comprehensive consideration current issues from theoretical standpoint